I think it’s a good idea for the Intelligence Community to be front runners regarding new technologies. Familiarity with resources that other people are using or are going to use is critical. Web 2.0 tools would be very beneficial to the agency. But they have to be evaluated and rolled out to areas very carefully. For instance, RSS, a faster way to get news to workers, would work well. Blogs allow everyone in the agency to feel like they are “in the loop”. Wiki’s and collaborative tools are great for a lot of work. Even though the article states that it is a “top secret network” between agencies, I would still be concerned about risks and leaks.
The article states “Although the agency’s mission of providing intelligence to support military planning and weapons acquisition is often fodder for spy novels or Hollywood blockbusters, Shepherd said the DIA’s analysts are similar to workers in other industries…”. Advantages such as collaboration, speed and participation levels would be a plus just like in any other workplace. Marketing might not be as critical.
Disadvantages such as resistance or cost to implement are not as big a concern to the military as they may be to other companies. They are used to keeping up with technology and usually have money available for new technologies, training, etc. However, even if the article downplays the spy factor, I’m not sure about them using all of the tools for all areas. Even with top secret clearance for access, having documents that anybody can edit would require a high standard for tracking and accountability. If something gets posted that is not “correct”, a lot of damage can be done during the time it is posted, even if it is caught and corrected later.
Younger workers are used to doing things in new ways. As an older I.T. person, I am always concerned with security; I came from a time when I.T. said no to everything. That has changed a lot and I am trying to change with it and see that almost anything is doable.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Like you mention in your blog, the pros of the military using Web 2.0 features outweigh the cons at face value. But any type of security issue could have some really bad consequences. From your IT background, I'm sure reading that article was a little strange. I assume you deal with cyber-threats everyday, so the thought of military intelligence being so easily accessible has to be a little un-nerving.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI share your concerns regarding security of sensitive military intellegence. However, your comment on stating it’s a good idea for the Intelligence Community to be front runners regarding new technologies, made me think of other applications that the Department of Defence displayed great innovation such as Global Positioning Systems. Our current GPS system originated as a military application. Of course this technology has revolutionized how we get from point A to point B with real time directional aids.
ReplyDelete-Craig Mitchell
I see your point of view on security issues, but having been part of one of the military branches they have very secured systems. Their systems are very well taken care of and overseen. But I can agree that not everything is 100% protected, so that is a risk they take. I do agree with you on how the military should be the ones taking advantage and using the newest technologies available.
ReplyDelete